Comments on: Photo Gallery Manangement

By: Nick

Nick — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 19:13:31 +0000

iPAP 0.7 looks pretty good. I just took a quick look at some of the things that have changed (I was given 0.63. I can now include my own PHP in the templages which will allow me to setup my photos section like the rest of my site. The CSS has also been moved out to it’s own file which will allow me to incorporate my style switcher. I plan to upgrade to this new version in the the next few days. I’ll give the scoop when I do.

By: rebelpixel productions

rebelpixel productions — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:53:29 +0000

iPAP 0.7
The first public release of iPAP: Photo Album Publisher (formerly known as SPAM: Simple Photo Album Manager) is now ready for download. The zip contains a somewhat detailed documentation, and everything you need to know (for now) is there. The project …

By: Nick

Nick — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:38:31 +0000

Yes, it’s very much a matter of taste I guess. I liked a lot of the functionality of Gallery, but hated the bulky code and how it used tables for everything in the layout, not to mention the fact that it took hours to get it to validate properly as XHTML. I think iPAP/SPAM will turn out to be a great tool, but it needs a lot of work.

By: MaThIbUs

MaThIbUs — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:11:09 +0000

Of course I looked at the demo, otherwise I wouldn’t have said “…looks even better…”

But Pictorialis makes me feel like I’m browsing a photolog (I mean, you can TrackBack a photo :shock:)… I guess it’s just a matter of taste.

By: Nick

Nick — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 14:26:31 +0000

Yes, but did you look at the demo? It’s a photo gallery, with all of
the functionality of WordPress! I’ll have to see how easy it is to use
with the photos, but it looks like the best thing I’ve seen so far.

By: MaThIbUs

MaThIbUs — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:36:19 +0000

Pictorialis II looks even better than Pictorialis I although I keep on preferring iPAP… It’s just that I don’t want a photolog, but a photo gallery.