<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mtdewvirus.com/archives/2004/06/17/google-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mtdewvirus.com/archives/2004/06/17/google-search/</link>
	<description>Nick Momrik</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://mtdewvirus.com/archives/2004/06/17/google-search/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mtdewvirus.com/archives/2004/06/17/google-search/#comment-894</guid>
		<description>I don't really agree. The default WP search doesn't even return the post you wanted either. At least with the Google search it can return any page on my site with the words anywhere, not just WP posts with the words in the content. :neutral:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really agree. The default WP search doesn&#8217;t even return the post you wanted either. At least with the Google search it can return any page on my site with the words anywhere, not just WP posts with the words in the content. <img src='http://mtdewvirus.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':neutral:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaThIbUs</title>
		<link>http://mtdewvirus.com/archives/2004/06/17/google-search/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>MaThIbUs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mtdewvirus.com/archives/2004/06/17/google-search/#comment-893</guid>
		<description>Let's try that again.

There is too much now in my opinion. I prefer the standard WP search. For example, try a WP search for &#8220;redesign&#8221; (&lt;a href="/?s=redesign"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;). Now compare that result with &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/custom?domains=MtDewVirus.com&#38;q=redesign&#38;sa=Search&#38;sitesearch=MtDewVirus.com&#38;client=pub-3155768410737835&#38;forid=1&#38;ie=UTF-8&#38;oe=UTF-8&#38;cof=GALT%3A%23008000%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23336699%3BVLC%3A663399%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3A336699%3BALC%3A000000%3BT%3A0000FF%3BGFNT%3A0000FF%3BGIMP%3A0000FF%3BFORID%3A1%3B&#38;hl=en"&gt;what Google returns&lt;/a&gt;.

(I searched for that because I wanted to include you in &lt;a href="http://mathibus.com/archives/2004/06/27/redesigns/" title="Spring Redesigns: A List Apart."&gt;Well Re-Designed Weblogs Volume 1&lt;/a&gt; :cool:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s try that again.</p>
<p>There is too much now in my opinion. I prefer the standard WP search. For example, try a WP search for &#8220;redesign&#8221; (<a href="/?s=redesign">link</a>). Now compare that result with <a href="http://www.google.com/custom?domains=MtDewVirus.com&#38;q=redesign&#38;sa=Search&#38;sitesearch=MtDewVirus.com&#38;client=pub-3155768410737835&#38;forid=1&#38;ie=UTF-8&#38;oe=UTF-8&#38;cof=GALT%3A%23008000%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23336699%3BVLC%3A663399%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3A336699%3BALC%3A000000%3BT%3A0000FF%3BGFNT%3A0000FF%3BGIMP%3A0000FF%3BFORID%3A1%3B&#38;hl=en">what Google returns</a>.</p>
<p>(I searched for that because I wanted to include you in <a href="http://mathibus.com/archives/2004/06/27/redesigns/" title="Spring Redesigns: A List Apart.">Well Re-Designed Weblogs Volume 1</a> :cool:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jere</title>
		<link>http://mtdewvirus.com/archives/2004/06/17/google-search/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Jere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 02:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mtdewvirus.com/archives/2004/06/17/google-search/#comment-792</guid>
		<description>I dont think there is too much...i think it looks good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think there is too much&#8230;i think it looks good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
